True or False: Usually, the most dangerous risks generate the highest levels of panic and outrage.

The assertion that the most dangerous risks generate the highest levels of panic and outrage is nuanced and does not hold universally true. Public reactions can vary significantly depending on several factors, including the nature of the risk, the context in which it occurs, and public perception.

For example, a risk that is perceived as remote or unlikely may not evoke strong feelings, while a less dangerous risk that affects a large number of people may cause significant outrage simply due to its visibility or the immediacy of its effects. Thus, it is not always the intensity of the danger that correlates with the public's emotional response.

Additionally, factors like media coverage, personal experience, and societal values play a crucial role in how risks are perceived. Situations that trigger outrage might be influenced by human interest elements or perceived injustice rather than the severity of the risk itself. Therefore, stating that the most dangerous risks always generate the highest levels of panic and outrage oversimplifies the complex relationship between risk perception and public emotion.